NY Times calls for end to Electoral College
The New York Times is calling for an end to the Electoral College.
Americans would prefer by overwhelming majorities to elect a president using a popular vote system, the newspaper’s editorial board said in a piece published Monday.
“They understand, on a gut level, the basic fairness of awarding the nation’s highest office on the same basis as every other elected office — to the person who gets the most votes,” the editorial said.
On Monday, President-elect Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE sealed his presidential victory, even though his Democratic rival, Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE, beat him by more than 2.8 million votes.
“Yes, Mr. Trump won under the rules,” the editorial said, “but the rules should change so that a presidential election reflects the will of Americans and promotes a more participatory democracy.”
The Times called the Electoral College a “living symbol of America’s original sin.”
“When slavery was the law of the land, a direct popular vote would have disadvantaged the Southern states, with their large disenfranchised populations,” the Times said.
“Counting those men and women as three-fifths of a white person, as the Constitution originally did, gave the slave states more electoral votes.”
Now, the Electoral College system “tips the scales in favor of smaller states.”
The Times proposed a solution, saying the Constitution establishes the Electoral College but lets the states decide how to tell the electors to vote.
“Eleven states and the District of Columbia, representing 165 electoral votes, have already passed legislation to have their electors vote for the winner of the national popular vote,” The Times said.
“The agreement, known as the National Popular Vote interstate compact, would take effect once states representing a majority of electoral votes, currently 270, signed on. This would ensure that the national popular-vote winner would become president.”
By using a popular vote system, all Americans would be treated equally, the editorial said.
“The system as it now operates does a terrible job of representing the nation’s demographic and geographic diversity,” the piece said.
“It’s hard to understand,” the paper said, “why the loser of the popular vote should wind up running the country.”
Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey